TIPRP for Animal Patients
There
are domestic animals and non-domestic animals.
Among the non-domestic species are the free-ranging and captive; for
example zoo animals. Dosimeters can be placed in cages of facilities for
species in captivity. For free-ranging
animals, dosimeters will have to be miniaturized and micro-miniaturized for
micro-vertebrates such as some bats and birds.
For mega-vertebrates such as whales and elephants, dosimeters will have
to be injected along with GPS devices by darting the animals with tranquilizing
dart rifles. Acutely, many marine mammal strandings have been associated with
the use of military sonar. To
effectively promote the radiologic health of humans and animals, there is room
for investigating the health effects of RFR on domestic and non-domestic
animals.
Both groups of animals can be canaries alerting humanity
about the acute and chronic effects of RFR (Hässig et al., 2014). In the
rivers of the Amazon, the electric eel an apex predator (Electrophorus
electricus) use electroreception and electro-location for communication,
hunting and navigation. The increased use of RFR-MI due to TMTH can
disrupt essential parts of the biology of the E.
electricus and contribute to
the collapse of the fragile Amazonian ecosystem.
Discussions
Developing dosimeters and other instruments for measuring
exposure levels of RFR-EMI in animal patients are challenges that can be
overcome with the advancements in biomedical engineering. Devices for measuring and protection will
have to be tailored to suit the anatomy, physiology and behavior of the
animal. The monitoring and protective
collar tolerated by a dog or wolf will not be suitable for an anaconda patient.
Recommendation
United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA) mandated guidelines for the protection of
animal patients from excessive exposure to RFR-EMI will have to be established
(AVMA, 2015).
Conclusion
Uniform
international guidelines will have to be formulated to protect animal patients
from RFR-EMI due to increased use of TMTH in veterinary practices.
Expected
Results
We expect the one-week conference and the weekend fashion
show on TIPRP to be extremely successful.
TIPRP will have a logo (Figure 13 C) and the conference and fashion show
will be advertised one year in advance in health journals, science and
engineering websites, and magazines.
We do expect to observe initial peak levels of health measures resulting
from pre-TIPRP exposures. These values
are expected to decrease temporally as personal protective apparels and devices
are used.
Other data are summarized as equations, tables, graphs,
photographs, charts and videos in the appendices.
Major Discussion
The data from
TIPRP activities in the five sectors will be used to design more stringent
health promotion on RFR safety and protection (Chung-Feng, Hsin-Ginn,
Kuang-Ming, & Won-Fu, 2011). The
data will also be used to design more case-controlled studies on RFR safety and
formulate policies to protect health care workers from RFR. Bioassays with high
specificities and high sensitivities will have to be developed. The developing
embryos of the zebra fish (Danio rerio) and Japanese medaka (Oryzias
latipes) can be excellent animal models for chronic grow-out
carcinogenicity and genotoxicity studies (Praskova et al., 2014; Schartl, 2014). The grow-out exposure
studies in non-mammalian species will emulate the chronic, sub-lethal exposure
to RFR-EMI in humans.
Major Conclusion
TIPRP will
demonstrate the need to protect and sustain the optimal health of health care
workers who are exposed to RFR due to telehealth. It validates the hypothesis that health care
workers increasingly exposed to RFR require immediate personal protection even
as the health sciences paradigm is shifting to fully elucidate the acute and
chronic health effects of RFR on humans and animals. The increasingly
ubiquitous RFR due to telehealth must be carefully monitored to avert a
paradoxical pandemic in which humans and animals suffer multi-organ illnesses
due to RFR-EMF from TMTH advances.
No comments:
Post a Comment