Appendix A. Formulas and Equations
4 X4 P2 = (price +place+ product
+promotion) x (plan +perspective+ perseverance +passionate people)_____________________________________________________
(Equation 1.)
Appendix B. Tables, Graphs, Figures
and Charts
Appendix C. Figures, Charts and
Graphs
Figure 2.
http://www.medgadget.com/2010/03/rfid_patient_wristbands_safe for_ct_and_mri.html
Figure 3.
Children are given an
RFID tag brace, and a Nokia phone is used to scan the
tag. http://telecompk.net/2009/03/20/nokia-and-indus-hospital-
tag. http://telecompk.net/2009/03/20/nokia-and-indus-hospital-
implement-electronic-surveillance-system-for-pneumonia/
Figure
4. Examples of
electromagnetic interference (EMI) using the Datex-Ohmeda Monitor 3-lead system
(A) and the GE MAC 5500 12-lead electrocardiogram machine (B). Note that in
(A), EMI was not observed until there was direct contact between the antenna
and the subject, whereas with (B), EMI was seen as far as 4 feet away from the
subject (Kapa et al., 2011).
Figure
5. The magnetic field
strength and signal fidelity were assessed. The magnetic field intensity is
shown as a function of distance of the antenna from the medical device (17 feet
is direct contact with the device while 1 foot is 16 feet away from the
device). Green indicates high signal fidelity and red indicates low signal
fidelity (Kapa, Pierce, Hayes, Holmes, & Asirvatham, 2011).
Figure
6. Mobile
phone ECG monitor
http://hosting4beginners.com/mobile-phone-ecg-monitor/
Figure 7.
Cell phone and the brain. Adapted from “Do Cell Phones Really Cause
Cancer”
by M. Merzenich, 2014. http://blog.brainhq.com/2014/11/17/cell-phones-really
cause-brain-cancer/
Figure 8.
Cell phones and brain cancer. Adapted from “Cell Phones Linked to Brain Cancer”
by
J.
Burne, 2007. http://www.encognitive.com/taxonomy/term/131
Figure 9.
SWOT Analysis chart. Adapted from “” by
Creately, 2014.
http://creately.com/SWOT-Analysis-Software#prettyPhoto
Figure
11.
EMF public exposure assessments in the European countries. The size of circles represents
the level of activity on the corresponding exposure methods as: i) long term RF
radiation monitoring systems, ii) survey by in-situ measurements, iii) personal
exposimetry and iv) exposure modeling to RF and/or ELF range. Adapted from “Report on the level of exposure (frequency,
patterns and modulation) in the European Union Part 1:Radiofrequency(RF)radiation”
byEFHRAN,2010 http://efhran.polimi.it/docs/D4_Report%20on%20the%20level%20of%20exposure%20in%20th
%20European%20Union_Oct2010.pdf
Figure
12. Three possible upstream regulators were
enriched. Direct evidence between two genes from previous literature reports is
shown as a solid line and indirect evidence is depicted as a dashed line.
Adapted from
“Identification of Gene Expression Biomarkers for Predicting Radiation Exposure”
by Tzu-Pin Lu, Yi-Yao Hsu, Liang-Chuan Lai, Mong-Hsun Tsai & Eric Y.Chuang Scientific Reports
4, Article number: 6293
http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/srep06293
Figure
13. TIPRP Logo.
Medical caduceus: Adapted from “Caduceus with DNA Helix”, by
U.S.
Department of Energy Human Genome Program, National Human Genome
Research
Institute,
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~ncscotts/GG/DNA_Gallery.htm
Figure 14. The many uses of the cell phone as a hand
held and pocket-carrying device by
physicians
and veterinarians, who are exposed to the RFR released due to its operation.
Adapted
from
“A surgeon's review of Google glass in the operating room” by K
Chin
Leong, 2015. Retrieved from http://www.fastcompany.com/3022534/internet-of-things/a
surgeons-review-of-google-glass-in-the-operating-room. Other retreivals from http://www.fivebelow.com/cell-phone-microscope.html.
Appendix D. Videos
Video 1. WHO Finding Adds to Debate Over Mobile Phones, Brain Cancer









No comments:
Post a Comment